Monday, August 5, 2019


Who should leave Malaysia, Kit Siang or Zakir Naik?

Ahmad Fadhki Shaari, MP for Pasir Mas wants Lim Kit Siang, DAP veteran and who has served, and continues to serve as a member of parliament since 1969 to leave Malaysia. This call comes in the wake of Kit Siang urging controversy-prone-preacher Dr Zakir Naik to leave Malaysia and return to India. The call by Pasir Mas MP as a comparison falls flat.

Kit Siang is a Malaysian citizen by virtue of his birth. Zakir Naik is an Indian citizen by birth and he has been given permanent resident status to live in Malaysia. Zakir Naik is a fugitive who had run away from law. Kit Siang is not a run away staying in Malaysia. People like Ahmad Fadhli who languish in false, fabricated and laughable history should know, or at least attempt to learn the truth, the historical truth.

When May 13th riot riots broke out in Kuala Lumpur Kit Siang was away in Kota Kinabalu. He heard of the riots whilst he was there. He could not return as Kuala Lumpur was under curfew, therefore he landed in Singapore. It was then evident that many politicians have had been arrested and detained under the much hated Internal Security Act. And it was very obvious that Kit Siang would be arrested. Here comes the crux of the difference between Kit Siang and Zakir Naik. Kit Siang braved the arrest and returned to Kuala Lumpur fully aware that he will be arrested and detained without trial for an indefinite period. He could have stayed away by not returning to Malaysia. He desisted such a notion.

Now let us look at Zakir Naik's position. He is wanted by Indian authorities to answer criminal charges that had been made against him. There is a warrant for his arrest. He will get a trial, not that he will be detained without any trial. The whole world is watching and is monitoring the Zakir Naik show. Zakir himself has imposed conditions to the effect he should not be detained on arrival in India. So what we have is a situation where Zakir Naik chickens out when it comes to facing the realities of law; but not Kit Siang who bravely walked into facing harsh detestable laws knowing too well he will be detained without any trial.

Member of Pasir Mas (Ahmad Fadhli) should go and read history and learn to distinguish between sand and gold. Sand will be washed away but gold will remain where it is. Zakir Naik is sand, Kit Siang is gold and will remain where he rightly belongs.

K. Siladass

No comments: